PR3 eller Roadsmart2 är grymma däck... Med mina preferenser o på min hoj så tyckte jag PR3 var lite bättre mest pga känslan för greppet.
Edit: PR3 verkar än så länge ha dubbla livslängden gentemot sportsmart & även betydligt längre än roadsmart...
Har du provat båda? har du källa på det du påstår?.
Hitta ett inlägg på ett annat forum av en som provat både Sportsmart och PP 3
I've had both the SportSmart and the Pilot Road 3 (currently fitted) on my SMT.
In the dry - Sportsmart all the way (for me). The levels of grip is amazing (keep putting the pegs down - really need to figure a way to fit the sliders and the peg rubber!) and surprisingly good in the wet. The feel very neutral in terms of their tippiness - you just put the bike at an angle and they seem to want to stay at that angle. Really liked them and I got nearly 8k miles out of the rear (but I tend not to be too hard on tyres).
Currently on PR3s (heard enough good stuff from other riders / dealers / tyre folk) to give them a try. There is less dry grip (obviously) than the Sportsmart but not alarmingly so (and certainly way more than the stupid Conti Sport Attacks that my bike originally had fitted). Still plenty enough grip to put the pegs down. However, in the wet / cold they are a different beast to the Sportsmarts. The warm up much quicker and give noticeably more grip. They feel slightly tippy in to a corner, though, which has taken a little getting used too (not alarming, just different to the Sportsmarts). The PR3s are currently 4K miles old and have plenty of life left.
For me - the perfect solution would be to have the sportsmarts on a set of hoops for the summer and the PR3s during the winter. As that isn't practicable, then going for one tyre and the PR3 would probably just edge it
