Tsunamin i Japan
- Thread starter Blanco
- Start date
CharlieC
gasa!
BostonGurka
Bannad
UNCLAS TOKYO 003432
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR ISN/NESS, EAP/J
Related Articles
*
Radiation health risks: Q&A
16 Mar 2011
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM, ENRG, TRGY, NRR, MNUC, PUNE, JA
SUBJECT: 3-4 DECEMBER NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY GROUP MEETING
1. (SBU) Summary: During the third meeting of the G8 Nuclear Safety and Security Group (NSSG) held in Tokyo December 3-4, NSSG members reviewed the status of ongoing projects, discussed the future of initiatives proposed during Japan's 2008 G8 presidency, and reviewed a draft plan of work for the 2009 Italian presidency. Members agreed the 3S initiative proposed by Japan and adopted in the Hokkaido Summit Leaders' Statement will continue during the Italian presidency, with Japan serving as coordinator for 3S-related activities. Regarding next year's meetings, Italy announced Germany has asked the NSSG to discuss approaches to and criteria for cooperation with emerging nuclear countries, and Germany will send out a draft paper to start discussion on that topic. Finally, Italy noted it will distribute a detailed plan of work to NSSG members before the next meeting. End Summary.
2. (SBU) Delegations from the G8 countries plus representatives of the European Union, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the International Atomic Energy Agency met in Tokyo December 3 and 4 for the Third Nuclear Safety and Security Group (NSSG) meeting of 2008. The meeting was chaired by Japan and included 47 representatives from the various parties.
3. (SBU) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director of International Nuclear Energy Cooperation Tsutomu Arai opened the meeting by noting several key objectives: discussing implementation of programs in Armenia and Ukraine, preparing for the upcoming EBRD Chernobyl Shelter Fund and Nuclear Safety Account meetings in London, and reviewing Italy's work plan for its upcoming presidency. The draft agenda was adopted with one member comment: The Russian delegation noted it was acceptable to discuss work being undertaken on the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, but substantive decision-making for the program should remain in those fora where it has been traditionally handled.
4. (SBU) The first items discussed were ongoing programs in Armenia and Ukraine. The IAEA presenter described the Agency's objectives and efforts for 2008 in Armenia, specifically noting several technical cooperation meetings it held on the subjects of design safety, seismic safety, and operational safety. Regarding the Ukraine/IAEA/European Union joint project, the presenter noted the effort had fallen behind schedule. However, the IAEA, he reported, hopes to gain lost time and meet the original deadline of 2010. He said that the IAEA is very satisfied with the project. Representatives from Russia and the EU, as well the U.S. delegation, then described various support provided
those projects.
5. (SBU) In response to a U.S. question about the ability of Armenia's regulatory body to obtain sufficient staff, the IAEA representative suggested several positive developments were occurring in Armenia: regulatory body had been placed under the PM almost at ministry level, that organization's budget has been increased, its chairman was confirmed in September, and finally, it had agreed to work with the IAEA to conduct a comprehensive review of its legal and regulatory framework.
6. (SBU) On earthquakes and nuclear safety, the IAEA presenter noted the Agency has officials in Japan to learn from Japan's recent experience dealing with earthquakes and described several areas of IAEA focus. First, he explained that safety guides for seismic safety have only been revised three times in the last 35 years and that the IAEA is now reexamining them. Also, the presenter noted recent earthquakes in some cases have exceeded the design basis for some nuclear plants, and that this a serious problem that is now driving seismic safety work. The IAEA is issuing a new guide on seismic evaluation to accompany existing guidelines on seismic hazard and design. Finally, the IAEA noted it had launched an International Seismic Safety Center at its September general conference to enhance safety, develop standards, pool and share knowledge.
7. (SBU) Turning to EBRD-administered Chernobyl projects, the chair noted there was still a financial gap between pledges and the estimated cost of the projects and invited the EBRD representative to give a presentation. Regarding the Nuclear Safety Account project, the EBRD representative reported good progress was being made overall, but that required redesign of the transport cask would result in a five month extension to Work Release 1. The presenter noted the overall schedule continues to experience delays and the current estimated completion date is October 2010. The chair asked the EBRD to produce a document detailing the delays so that members could explain the costs involved to their financial authorities. Responding to a U.S. question, the EBRD rep noted the hope to have members re-confirm their existing pledge and ask non-G8 members to pledge. The rep stated the Bank hopes to have a better idea of the costs by February.
8. (SBU) On the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, the EBRD rep described several positive developments, e.g., the completion of roof repair, but commented the lack of sufficient local work force threatens to cause delays. He went on to describe the New Safe Confinement (CDSD) effort, noting the builders have selected a design different from the original concept, but still hoped to have it approved by December. He said the planners have not yet assessed the impact of CDSD-related
delays, but noted current cost estimates show a possible increase of 50 million euros.
9. (SBU) The IAEA then gave a presentation describing its creation of a Code of Conduct and Guidance on Import & Export of Radioactive Sources. The presenter noted the code is non-binding, but enjoys widespread support. As of November, 92 states had written to the Director General expressing support for the Code of Conduct. The U.S. delegation followed by giving its presentation on the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, which described the plan of work, the exercise program, and the Information Portal.
10. (SBU) On the Global Nuclear Safety Network (GNSN), the IAEA presenter described the GNSN as a set of internationally-accessible networks and resources for information exchange and cooperation in nuclear safety matters. The speaker noted that while initial development of the network occurred in Germany, the IAEA had agreed to take over hosting responsibilities and the network can now be accessed at gnsn-iaea.org. Japan noted the Asian Nuclear Safety Network (ANSN) shares the same goal of information sharing, but adds encouraging regional cooperation to its objectives. Like the GNSN, the ANSN relies on the IAEA for some hosting support, but also has hubs in China, Japan, and Korea.
11. (SBU) Regarding its International Initiative on 3S-based Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, which was adopted by consensus in the Hokkaido Summit Leaders' Statement, Japan proposed a framework covering the next five years. Japan suggested NSSG members and the IAEA make voluntary reports on their activities during the first two years, related to the safety, security and safeguards. At each regular NSSG meeting, members will also be able to make observations on challenges surfacing in infrastructure development and the IAEA could propose projects for consideration. Delegations broadly agreed that considering all three issues (safety, security, and safeguards) together, rather than breaking them up for discussion, is the best plan of action, especially since the NSSG mandate is not well-suited to discussing safeguards by itself. Following the initial two years of reports, the NSSG members could then discuss and decide on follow-on projects for the next three years.
12. (SBU) French, Canadian, EU, and U.S. delegations spoke in general support of Japan's proposal. However, Canada's delegation noted asking the IAEA to suggest projects will create expectations; a different role for the IAEA might be better. The U.S. delegation noted support for the Initiative and the plan, but said it cannot commit now to financial assistance to 3S projects. The Russian delegation commented that safeguards, nominally a part of the 3S initiative, fall under the IAEA's purview and asked NSSG members to take into account the outcomes of upcoming IAEA events for 3S planning.
The IAEA representative noted the IAEA already covers safety, security, and safeguards as part of the broader issue set in which it works. As such, it would be difficult for the IAEA to propose new standards in those areas. However, he said the Agency supports the effort with that condition. Japan then volunteered to serve as organizer for ongoing 3S work during the upcoming Italian presidency.
13. (SBU) The U.S. delegation began the second day of meetings by giving a presentation on the Nuclear Regulatory Committee's education grant program. In response, several delegations asked questions about the intent of the program, the IAEA noted several programs of its own and the Russian delegation offered to give a presentation at a future meeting on Russia's education efforts. Japan, describing its concerns about maintaining a sufficient workforce in the face of population decline and upcoming retirements, noted that it has been subsidizing education in the field since 2007 as part of a Human Resources Development Program. Related to this effort, the Japan Association of Nuclear Industry is working to draw up a roadmap for human resources development in Japan.
14. (SBU) The Italian delegation followed by describing a proposed program of work for its 2009 G8 presidency. In addition to ongoing Chernobyl projects, Italy noted it would work to focus efforts on improving the safety of plants in operation, strengthening safety and security related to earthquakes and radioactive source, the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, Multilateral Approaches to the Fuel Cycle, the GNSN, and the 3S Initiative, with special emphasis on nuclear education and training. The Italian delegation noted, based on a German request, that it may be useful for the NSSG to discuss different kinds of approaches to, and different criteria for, cooperating with emerging nuclear countries. Italy proposed the topic for the first meeting of 2009. Responding to concerns it could be a sensitive topic, the Italian rep noted it does not intend for emerging nuclear countries to be a permanent part of the 2009 agenda, merely an additional topic for discussion at the first meeting. Italy noted it had asked Germany to prepare a non-paper to distribute to NSSG members to create a starting point for discussion. After a comment by the EU on putting this discussion in the context of international cooperation, Italy noted it in no way wanted to diminish the rights of countries to go nuclear, but wanted to discuss the basis for cooperation with such countries. The Japanese and Canadian delegations asked whether such a discussion would be constructive for the NPT. Finally, Italy noted it is preparing a detailed work plan document that will be provided to members before the next meeting.
15. (U) This message has been cleared by ISN/NESS. SCHIEFFER
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR ISN/NESS, EAP/J
Related Articles
*
Radiation health risks: Q&A
16 Mar 2011
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM, ENRG, TRGY, NRR, MNUC, PUNE, JA
SUBJECT: 3-4 DECEMBER NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY GROUP MEETING
1. (SBU) Summary: During the third meeting of the G8 Nuclear Safety and Security Group (NSSG) held in Tokyo December 3-4, NSSG members reviewed the status of ongoing projects, discussed the future of initiatives proposed during Japan's 2008 G8 presidency, and reviewed a draft plan of work for the 2009 Italian presidency. Members agreed the 3S initiative proposed by Japan and adopted in the Hokkaido Summit Leaders' Statement will continue during the Italian presidency, with Japan serving as coordinator for 3S-related activities. Regarding next year's meetings, Italy announced Germany has asked the NSSG to discuss approaches to and criteria for cooperation with emerging nuclear countries, and Germany will send out a draft paper to start discussion on that topic. Finally, Italy noted it will distribute a detailed plan of work to NSSG members before the next meeting. End Summary.
2. (SBU) Delegations from the G8 countries plus representatives of the European Union, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the International Atomic Energy Agency met in Tokyo December 3 and 4 for the Third Nuclear Safety and Security Group (NSSG) meeting of 2008. The meeting was chaired by Japan and included 47 representatives from the various parties.
3. (SBU) Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director of International Nuclear Energy Cooperation Tsutomu Arai opened the meeting by noting several key objectives: discussing implementation of programs in Armenia and Ukraine, preparing for the upcoming EBRD Chernobyl Shelter Fund and Nuclear Safety Account meetings in London, and reviewing Italy's work plan for its upcoming presidency. The draft agenda was adopted with one member comment: The Russian delegation noted it was acceptable to discuss work being undertaken on the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, but substantive decision-making for the program should remain in those fora where it has been traditionally handled.
4. (SBU) The first items discussed were ongoing programs in Armenia and Ukraine. The IAEA presenter described the Agency's objectives and efforts for 2008 in Armenia, specifically noting several technical cooperation meetings it held on the subjects of design safety, seismic safety, and operational safety. Regarding the Ukraine/IAEA/European Union joint project, the presenter noted the effort had fallen behind schedule. However, the IAEA, he reported, hopes to gain lost time and meet the original deadline of 2010. He said that the IAEA is very satisfied with the project. Representatives from Russia and the EU, as well the U.S. delegation, then described various support provided
those projects.
5. (SBU) In response to a U.S. question about the ability of Armenia's regulatory body to obtain sufficient staff, the IAEA representative suggested several positive developments were occurring in Armenia: regulatory body had been placed under the PM almost at ministry level, that organization's budget has been increased, its chairman was confirmed in September, and finally, it had agreed to work with the IAEA to conduct a comprehensive review of its legal and regulatory framework.
6. (SBU) On earthquakes and nuclear safety, the IAEA presenter noted the Agency has officials in Japan to learn from Japan's recent experience dealing with earthquakes and described several areas of IAEA focus. First, he explained that safety guides for seismic safety have only been revised three times in the last 35 years and that the IAEA is now reexamining them. Also, the presenter noted recent earthquakes in some cases have exceeded the design basis for some nuclear plants, and that this a serious problem that is now driving seismic safety work. The IAEA is issuing a new guide on seismic evaluation to accompany existing guidelines on seismic hazard and design. Finally, the IAEA noted it had launched an International Seismic Safety Center at its September general conference to enhance safety, develop standards, pool and share knowledge.
7. (SBU) Turning to EBRD-administered Chernobyl projects, the chair noted there was still a financial gap between pledges and the estimated cost of the projects and invited the EBRD representative to give a presentation. Regarding the Nuclear Safety Account project, the EBRD representative reported good progress was being made overall, but that required redesign of the transport cask would result in a five month extension to Work Release 1. The presenter noted the overall schedule continues to experience delays and the current estimated completion date is October 2010. The chair asked the EBRD to produce a document detailing the delays so that members could explain the costs involved to their financial authorities. Responding to a U.S. question, the EBRD rep noted the hope to have members re-confirm their existing pledge and ask non-G8 members to pledge. The rep stated the Bank hopes to have a better idea of the costs by February.
8. (SBU) On the Chernobyl Shelter Fund, the EBRD rep described several positive developments, e.g., the completion of roof repair, but commented the lack of sufficient local work force threatens to cause delays. He went on to describe the New Safe Confinement (CDSD) effort, noting the builders have selected a design different from the original concept, but still hoped to have it approved by December. He said the planners have not yet assessed the impact of CDSD-related
delays, but noted current cost estimates show a possible increase of 50 million euros.
9. (SBU) The IAEA then gave a presentation describing its creation of a Code of Conduct and Guidance on Import & Export of Radioactive Sources. The presenter noted the code is non-binding, but enjoys widespread support. As of November, 92 states had written to the Director General expressing support for the Code of Conduct. The U.S. delegation followed by giving its presentation on the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, which described the plan of work, the exercise program, and the Information Portal.
10. (SBU) On the Global Nuclear Safety Network (GNSN), the IAEA presenter described the GNSN as a set of internationally-accessible networks and resources for information exchange and cooperation in nuclear safety matters. The speaker noted that while initial development of the network occurred in Germany, the IAEA had agreed to take over hosting responsibilities and the network can now be accessed at gnsn-iaea.org. Japan noted the Asian Nuclear Safety Network (ANSN) shares the same goal of information sharing, but adds encouraging regional cooperation to its objectives. Like the GNSN, the ANSN relies on the IAEA for some hosting support, but also has hubs in China, Japan, and Korea.
11. (SBU) Regarding its International Initiative on 3S-based Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, which was adopted by consensus in the Hokkaido Summit Leaders' Statement, Japan proposed a framework covering the next five years. Japan suggested NSSG members and the IAEA make voluntary reports on their activities during the first two years, related to the safety, security and safeguards. At each regular NSSG meeting, members will also be able to make observations on challenges surfacing in infrastructure development and the IAEA could propose projects for consideration. Delegations broadly agreed that considering all three issues (safety, security, and safeguards) together, rather than breaking them up for discussion, is the best plan of action, especially since the NSSG mandate is not well-suited to discussing safeguards by itself. Following the initial two years of reports, the NSSG members could then discuss and decide on follow-on projects for the next three years.
12. (SBU) French, Canadian, EU, and U.S. delegations spoke in general support of Japan's proposal. However, Canada's delegation noted asking the IAEA to suggest projects will create expectations; a different role for the IAEA might be better. The U.S. delegation noted support for the Initiative and the plan, but said it cannot commit now to financial assistance to 3S projects. The Russian delegation commented that safeguards, nominally a part of the 3S initiative, fall under the IAEA's purview and asked NSSG members to take into account the outcomes of upcoming IAEA events for 3S planning.
The IAEA representative noted the IAEA already covers safety, security, and safeguards as part of the broader issue set in which it works. As such, it would be difficult for the IAEA to propose new standards in those areas. However, he said the Agency supports the effort with that condition. Japan then volunteered to serve as organizer for ongoing 3S work during the upcoming Italian presidency.
13. (SBU) The U.S. delegation began the second day of meetings by giving a presentation on the Nuclear Regulatory Committee's education grant program. In response, several delegations asked questions about the intent of the program, the IAEA noted several programs of its own and the Russian delegation offered to give a presentation at a future meeting on Russia's education efforts. Japan, describing its concerns about maintaining a sufficient workforce in the face of population decline and upcoming retirements, noted that it has been subsidizing education in the field since 2007 as part of a Human Resources Development Program. Related to this effort, the Japan Association of Nuclear Industry is working to draw up a roadmap for human resources development in Japan.
14. (SBU) The Italian delegation followed by describing a proposed program of work for its 2009 G8 presidency. In addition to ongoing Chernobyl projects, Italy noted it would work to focus efforts on improving the safety of plants in operation, strengthening safety and security related to earthquakes and radioactive source, the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, Multilateral Approaches to the Fuel Cycle, the GNSN, and the 3S Initiative, with special emphasis on nuclear education and training. The Italian delegation noted, based on a German request, that it may be useful for the NSSG to discuss different kinds of approaches to, and different criteria for, cooperating with emerging nuclear countries. Italy proposed the topic for the first meeting of 2009. Responding to concerns it could be a sensitive topic, the Italian rep noted it does not intend for emerging nuclear countries to be a permanent part of the 2009 agenda, merely an additional topic for discussion at the first meeting. Italy noted it had asked Germany to prepare a non-paper to distribute to NSSG members to create a starting point for discussion. After a comment by the EU on putting this discussion in the context of international cooperation, Italy noted it in no way wanted to diminish the rights of countries to go nuclear, but wanted to discuss the basis for cooperation with such countries. The Japanese and Canadian delegations asked whether such a discussion would be constructive for the NPT. Finally, Italy noted it is preparing a detailed work plan document that will be provided to members before the next meeting.
15. (U) This message has been cleared by ISN/NESS. SCHIEFFER
WEST
Gudomlig sporthojare
En kompis som jobbar i med kärnkraft sa: Vi som jobbar i branschen har nog generellt sett mer info än allmänheten(Jag tänker på Fukushima). Ibland tänker jag även på uttrycket "Ignorance is a bliss". Vilket i korthet skulle kunna sammanfattas som. "Ibland önskar jag att jag var en idiot och inte fattar någonting". Man kanske skulle gå till skogs och sparka kott, eller nått.
Det ser inte bra ut nu där borta.
Det ser inte bra ut nu där borta.
KGK
1200
några länder råder lämna landet
Australien, Storbritannien och Tyskland rekommenderar sina medborgare att överväga att lämna Japan på grund av risken för stigande strålningsnivåer.
Stor trängsel råder på Tokyo-flygplatsen Haneda. Folk försöker lämna Japan av rädsla för strålningshotet, rapporterar BBC.
Men fyfan vilka hysteriska kärringar som hänger här.
Kärnkraft är det bästa som finns just nu, vi måste bygga ut den, helst i förrgår, för att inte döda vår planet med fossila bränslen.
Avfallet blir till nytt bränsle i nästa generations breed reaktorer, och med lite forskning på det så kanske vi kan köra det ytterligare en gång så att det kan slutförvaras i en pappkartong under sängen.
Men i det här jävla miljömuppslandet har det ju rått tankeförbud kring kärnkraft, vi har haft förbud mot att forska och förbättra, vi var ett av världens främsta länder när det gällde nukleärforskning, men all kompetens dödades.
Sol vind oich vatten har haft 30års försprång utvecklingsmässigt (sedan omröstningen då miljömupparna lovade att det skulle vara lösningen), men är fortfarande bara dyra löjliga experiment som lämmnar lite el på marginalen, lite sporadiskt och oftast när den inte behövs..
Kärnkraft behövs, NU!
Kärnkraft är det bästa som finns just nu, vi måste bygga ut den, helst i förrgår, för att inte döda vår planet med fossila bränslen.
Avfallet blir till nytt bränsle i nästa generations breed reaktorer, och med lite forskning på det så kanske vi kan köra det ytterligare en gång så att det kan slutförvaras i en pappkartong under sängen.
Men i det här jävla miljömuppslandet har det ju rått tankeförbud kring kärnkraft, vi har haft förbud mot att forska och förbättra, vi var ett av världens främsta länder när det gällde nukleärforskning, men all kompetens dödades.
Sol vind oich vatten har haft 30års försprång utvecklingsmässigt (sedan omröstningen då miljömupparna lovade att det skulle vara lösningen), men är fortfarande bara dyra löjliga experiment som lämmnar lite el på marginalen, lite sporadiskt och oftast när den inte behövs..
Kärnkraft behövs, NU!
BostonGurka
Bannad
WEST
Gudomlig sporthojare
Kanon när idiot kommer med idiot-uttalande. Empati har du kanske inte kommit till i ditt liv, folk har dött i massor där borta och fler lär det bli.
Trevligt, är du också lika bitter som Guw.
Last edited:
Hur många har dött av kärnkraft, och hur många har dött av fossilkraft.
Kärnkraften dödar några få (japp, även hundratals människor är några få i sammanhanget) i händelse av en olycka, fossila bränslen dödar folk kontinuerligt och förgiftar vår miljö.
Dom som har dött i massor därborta har dött av en jordbävning/översvämmning.
Hur många har dött av kärnkraftsolyckan? ett dussin?
Biltmore
Blood Group: Red
Bearing
Gudomlig sporthojare
Hur kan ni tolka det som att BostonGurka håller med GuW?
Han är ju så klart ironisk, och har ju gått i Tage Danielssons fotspår genom hela tråden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjuhW-4tyEI
Han är ju så klart ironisk, och har ju gått i Tage Danielssons fotspår genom hela tråden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjuhW-4tyEI
WEST
Gudomlig sporthojare
Samma bullshit som alltid, i chernobyl stängde man en stad och hur många som dog vet jag inte. På grund av det utfodrar samerna sina rena för att marken är radioaktiv.
Men det är skit samma hur vi har det här nu denna tråd handlar om hur Japanerna har det i sin skit, så ditt inlägg var ju ganska löjligt.
Håll dig till ämnet.
Hur många har dött av kärnkraftsolyckan i Japan, och hur många har dött av jordbävningen/flodvågen?
Hittils har vatten dödat betydligt fler.
Last edited:
Inte av kärnkraft ändå va? Det var ju faktiskt det GuW snackade om.
WEST
Gudomlig sporthojare
Han gör ett löjligt uttalade som inte passar här. Läs alla inlägg.
Appropå löjliga uttalanden!
Dessutom skickar West en massa löjliga PM till mig också, men sånt tjäbbel orkar jag inte bry mig om.
Last edited:
Det har jag ju iofs inte gjort. Läst alla inlägg alltså. Men det du citerade var väl inte så upprörande?
Han har ju rätt i sak vad gäller den nygamla hysterin som blossat upp angående kärnkraft i allmänhet. Wetterstrand vädrar förstås morgonluft och tar tillfället i akt och fiskar röster på japanernas bekostnad. Europeiska reaktorer stängs ner, debatt skapas, man ska "se över" saker osv. Bullshit. Det är naturligtvis bara ett sätt för styrande att visa att man minsann agerar för att samla pluspoäng. Precis som alla helt plötsligt föraktar och baktalar ledarna i arabvärlden. Inte ett knyst från någon innan. Otroligt patetiskt.
Man har väl förmodligen alla tänkbara säkerhetssystem som finns redan och att jämföra risker med de risker som finns i Japan är ju lite konstigt med tanke på hur den seismologiska aktiviteten ser ut därborta. Här i Europa finns helt andra risker som istället borde ses över och då tänker jag på terrorister. Uppenbarligen saknas ju helt fungerande rutiner på de svenska verken med tanke på hur enkelt GreenPeace kunde ta sig in och manifestera. Nästa gång är det Usama och hans kusiner som söker martyrskap.
Det som ter sig löjligt i dina ögon är det inte alltid för resten av läsande.
Sen har du tydligen en otrevlig tendens att försöka styra dina åsikter bort ifrån publika ögon, mycket illavarslande.
Wiseguy
Medlem nr.8 sen starten
- Gick med
- 6 Mar 2003
- Hoj
- Honda CBR900RR Fireblade, CBR1100XX Blackbird
En sammafattning irån Reuters i .pdf format:
http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/AS/pdf/JapanReactors1603_mv.pdf
http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/AS/pdf/JapanReactors1603_mv.pdf
Halogen
Apajävel!
Tadaa:
http://www-958.ibm.com/software/dat...976/comments/2e70ae944fb511e0ae0c000255111976
Antal dödsfall per producerad TWh.
Nyheter
|
VM-kval i isracing i Sverige 1 februari
2024,fim,isg,ice speedway,i... |
|
|
Färre döda i vägtrafiken
Foto: Jacob Sjöman Tran... |
|
|
Generationsskifte hos KTM: Stefan Pierer lämnar över ledningen till Co-CEO Gottfried Neumeister
Pressmeddelande, Mattighofe... |
|
GOTLAND RING BIKE WEEK 2025!
Foton: Michael Grundell ... |
|
Brembo och Michelin i samarbete – för säkerhets skull
Däckjätten Michelin och bro... |
|
|
Royal Enfield expanderar efter rekordförsäljning
Indiska motorcykeltillverka... |
|
Isracing-VM-kval i Sverige 1 februari
Den 1 februari körs V... |
|
|
Michelin och Brembo i samarbete för ökad säkerhet
Däckjätten Michelin och bro... |
|
MC-mässan flyttar till Jönköping
MC-Mässan 2026 genomförs på... |
|
|
Eldriven motocrosshoj från CFMOTO
Kinesiska motorcykeltillver... |